Skip to content
Cambridge International Law Journal
Edward Elgar Publishing (www.elgaronline.com/cilj)
  • Home
  • The CILJ
    • Article Submissions
    • Submission Instructions
    • Journal Archive
    • Subscriptions
  • Annual Conference
    • 14th Annual Conference of the Cambridge International Law Journal
    • Conference Archive
  • CILJ-LCIL Annual Lecture
    • Annual Lecture Archive
  • Blog
    • Blog Submissions
    • Latest Posts
  • About CILJ
    • Editors-in-Chief
    • Faculty Advisory Board
    • Editorial Board
    • Academic Review Board
  • Contact

Category: International Criminal Law

ICC’s Struggle with the Evidentiary Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt

February 22, 2021 Utkarsh Krishna

Article 66 of the Rome Statute mandates the International Criminal Court (ICC) to impose a conviction only when the guilt…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: International Criminal Law, Litigation, Procedure

Will the Netherlands Government succeed in Ending Syrian Government’s Impunity for War Crimes?

February 10, 2021 Vaishnavi Chaudhry

On September 18th, 2020, the Netherlands government announced its decision to hold the Assad-led Syrian regime accountable for gross human…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: Human Rights, International Criminal Law

The Sporadic Application of an Acquitted Person’s Claim for Compensation under the Rome Statute

January 15, 2021 Poorna Poovamma 1 Comment

Article 85 of the Rome Statute (the “Statute”) is a provision that is novel, with Article 85(3) being, to this…

Continue Reading →

Posted in: International Criminal Law, Litigation, Procedure

Post navigation

Page 4 of 4
← Previous 1 … 3 4

About

The CILJ is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal with a broad focus on international and EU law. It is run by the postgraduate community of the Cambridge Faculty of Law.

Recent Blogs

  • The AG’s Opinion in Seraing: Protecting Autonomy and Integration, but at What Cost?
  • Removing Sudan v UAE from the ICJ’s General List: Striking the Right Balance?
  • Should Negative Emissions Count Toward Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement? Pros and Cons Considering Early Submissions in the Third Round of NDCs

Topics

Recent Comments

  • Ertogrul Baylarbayli on The Inclusion of Ecocide: Legal Challenges and Prospects for the Rome Statute
  • Ziya Agdamski on The Inclusion of Ecocide: Legal Challenges and Prospects for the Rome Statute
  • Khalid Been Ahmad on Montauk Metals v Colombia: An Award With Entangled Reasoning?
  • Antonella Trentini on Unveiling Modern Slavery: Visual Solutions to a Hidden Crisis
  • Sadla Tarnim on Environmental Justice in Investment Arbitration: Will Renco v Peru (II) Pave the Way?

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Copyright © 2025 Cambridge International Law Journal — Primer WordPress theme by GoDaddy